INSIGHTS FROM FIRST FOUNDATION

A First Foundation Blog

Investor Education – Tax Reform 2018

| 12/20/17 9:21 AM

Welcome to our financial education resource, covering key topics in financial services, including terminology, trends, and strategies shaping the investment and banking industries. We have developed this resource to empower you to make informed decisions about your finances and be better prepared when working with your advisor and/or banker. 

On Friday, December 15, the House and Senate Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Conference Committee released details of the tax reform bill. The proposed bill comes after several weeks of negotiations to resolve differences in the House and Senate versions.

If this legislation is voted through by Congress, it would then go to President Trump to sign it into law. We will continue to monitor the details and expect a more in-depth piece on the subject once the bill is finalized. 

But first, some insights from our Chairman and Chief Economist, Rick Keller, CFP®, as told to Tyler Resh, Director of Marketing and Strategy.

The Big Picture: What is the overall goal of the reform?

I think as we consider the big picture here, the overall goal is to simplify the tax code for individuals, implement a lower corporate tax rate for corporations, and have a mechanism to tax overseas profits so we can see some of those dollars repatriated here to the U.S.

The Benefits to Corporations: Who stands to gain most from the reform?

For the most part, I think that we're going to see the corporation tax changes as providing the largest impact from this tax code reform.

Impact on Individuals: What are the biggest changes for individuals?

From an investor standpoint the things that we're concerned with is the shortness of time between date of enactment and the end of the year that would allow us to move money around. 

The other aspect is if we lose the deductibility of California state taxes since most of our clients are in the 9.6% up to 13.3% California state income tax bracket, the use of tax-free, tax-deferred and other techniques that defer a tax liability are going to become more important than ever because you will no longer save anywhere between 39.6% currently and 28%. The alternative minimum tax kind of stops the deductibility of state income tax and your property tax at 28% rate. But still you lose that deduction; it'll take at least 3% off your tax savings on your federal returns. So that would be the biggest change for those of us in California.

We also could be in a situation where we are recommending that clients pay their 2017 property taxes before year end. Prepaying allowable property taxes, or other deductible expenses, by year-end might be a good strategy as some deductions might not be available for deduction in 2018.

Impact on Affordability and Housing: Should individuals consider moving to more tax friendly states?

The financial gain by moving out of state is going to be larger than ever. It is a combination of high state income tax rates, sales tax rates and our property taxes, though for some long-term owners Prop 13 has limited them to the cost basis of their house, but if you have a newer purchase it can still be quite high.  Not being able to deduct these things will be a high cost, particularly for our beautiful weather here in California.

Rush Job: What is the impact on hurrying this bill through to get it done before 2018?

By rushing the tax proposals through, there are a lot of unintended consequences. A couple of the ones that would be of concern to me would be in the area of education. So education tax credit, deductibility of student loan interest for lower income people, taxation of scholarships for those people that are in graduate school, those kind of things I think are counterproductive to what we would like to see.

Impact on the Economy: What are the potential effects of this tax plan on the economy?

The tax proposal has an ultimate goal of stimulating the economy. The problem is the economy's doing just fine on its own without the stimulus. I would think that the benefits to small business and big corporations, the ability to accumulate capital, have higher returns on capital, normally are going to create more jobs and bring some companies back that had gone overseas, because now it's going to be more attractive than ever to produce and make things here at home. So we will have a much more competitive global tax rate now, so I'm going to take that as a big positive, especially for small business.

The big worry has to be on the deficit because every estimate I've seen that over the next 10 years this would increase the deficit by about $1.5 trillion, and that's high given the current level that would add about 10% or more. Right now we have about $16 trillion in U.S. government debt in private hands. If you add Social Security, it adds another $5 trillion. If you add some of the other unfunded liabilities, you get up to about $22 trillion. So $1.5 trillion added, it is impactful but to me it's really too big now and they need to think about how we get it down, and there's only two ways: Cut expenses or increase taxes.

Meaningful Changes: How should we view the changes to businesses and individuals?

For both big and small businesses, I think it is a very meaningful tax change. For individuals, the changes are rather small. The high-income people, their taxes actually go up because of a loss of deductions. Low-income people, their taxes actually go down despite some of the things I've seen in the paper. But I think all-in-all the real impact is going to be simplification, because the increases in the personal exemptions are substantial. A lot of people that currently itemize will no longer have to itemize – not having to prepare the individual Schedule A itemized deduction worksheets, it's going to make life a whole lot simpler for a lot of people. So that will be a change but the impact on capital formation for businesses could be quite impressive.

Impact on Our Approach to Investing: What do we expect to be the impact on investments?

From an investing standpoint, I don't see a whole lot of change in that the tax bracket for ordinary rates and capital gains rates are still going to be very wide so you're still going to want to maximize long term capital gains over short-term capital gains, which means holding things over years opposed to less than a year. I think the desirability on a net after-tax basis of municipal bonds is going to be more attractive if you live in a high-tax state like California, so we're looking at those with renewed interest.

In Support of Tax Planning: What does this reform tell us about the importance of tax planning?

Tax planning for this year is as important as ever, but the savings will be similar no matter which year you were to take a loss and offset, this year or not. There are some meaningful changes in the estate tax area that we're going to want to spend some time on with individual clients.

Staying on Top of the Changes: How we are monitoring the news

We will definitely stay on top of things, and we will be on top of the changes for you and how they impact your portfolios; and what we can do to add value to your situation. Expect more from us as details become available. And expect a more in-depth piece on the totality of the reform once everything is finalized.

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION    

Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by First Foundation Advisors), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from First Foundation Advisors. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. First Foundation Advisors is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the First Foundation Advisors’ current written disclosure statement discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request. Please Note: First Foundation Advisors does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to First Foundation Advisors’ web site or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility therefore. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.

Rick Keller, CFP®, Chairman
About the Author
Rick Keller, CFP®, Chairman
Mr. Keller established the First Foundation Advisors’ predecessor organization in 1990. During the past 24 years he has provided the vision and investment management leadership to create an integrated financial company offering wealth management, consulting, trust and banking services. As the Chairman of the Board he defines and communicates our corporate values throughout the organization and communities we serve. His knowledge of the economy is a key part in delivering investment management services at First Foundation Advisors. He is a recognized leader in the field of investment advisors. Rick served as a Trustee of the University of California, Irvine Foundation, chair of the Foundation’s Investment Committee, and is a current member of the Investment Committee. Mr. Keller was honored to be selected as consultant to the Investment Advisory Committee of The Regents of the University of California. Mr. Keller is a founding member of The Center for Investment and Wealth Management (CIWM) at UC Irvine’s Paul Merage School of Business. He served as co-chair of CIWM’s Executive Committee and Advisory Board for six years and was also a member of the Dean’s Advisory Board. Mr. Keller is active on several other boards of directors, including the Orange County Sheriff’s Advisory Board. Mr. Keller is a former executive board member of the UCI Center for Diabetes Treatment and Research. He served as member of the UC Irvine Planned Giving Forum, as well as on its steering committee. He also served as member of the board of directors of the Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.’s Institutional Advisory Board, the Orange County Business Committee for the Arts, and the formerly named Orange County Performing Arts Center (Segerstrom Center for the Arts). At various times, Mr. Keller has served on the City of Irvine’s Investment Committee as chair, the board of directors of Institute of Certified Financial Planners of Orange County, Hoag Hospital Endowment Council, and Planned Giving Round Table of Orange County. Mr. Keller earned a Bachelor of Science degree in finance from San Diego State University. He completed the financial planning program at the University of Southern California. Read more